ERIC POSNER

Search

Primary Menu

Skip to content
  • About
  • Blog
    • CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
    • FINANCIAL REGULATION
    • HUMAN RIGHTS
    • INTERNATIONAL LAW
    • LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP
    • ORIGINALISM
    • QUADRATIC VOTING
    • TEACHING
  • Books
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Slate
    • Other Media
  • Contact
judicial behavior

Party and agreement on the supreme court, updated

June 29, 2015 Eric Posner

Two of my earlier graphs updated through last Friday (with corrections).

sup ct within party 2

sup ct cross party 2

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • More
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

Post navigation

Previous PostKing v. Burwell and ideological independenceNext PostThe UN Human Rights Council: “all the cops are criminals…”

Kirkland and Ellis Distinguished Service Professor, University of Chicago Law School

Recent Posts

  • Is there a coming constitutional crisis?, #2 July 25, 2017
  • Is there a coming constitutional crisis? July 22, 2017
  • If Trump pardons, it could be a crime; with further meta-legal implications July 21, 2017
  • Can a president commit the crime of obstruction of justice? July 18, 2017
  • Über die Kraft der 140 Zeichen July 11, 2017
  • Twitter is a slot machine composed of humans July 7, 2017
  • Twenty Theses about Twitter July 3, 2017

Subscribe to Blog

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

Copyright © 2014 Eric Posner. All rights reserved. | judyostudio

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.