ERIC POSNER

Search

Primary Menu

Skip to content
  • About
  • Blog
    • CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
    • FINANCIAL REGULATION
    • HUMAN RIGHTS
    • INTERNATIONAL LAW
    • LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP
    • ORIGINALISM
    • QUADRATIC VOTING
    • TEACHING
  • Books
  • Contact
judicial behavior

Party and agreement on the supreme court, updated

June 29, 2015 Eric Posner

Two of my earlier graphs updated through last Friday (with corrections).

sup ct within party 2

sup ct cross party 2

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • More
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

Post navigation

Previous PostKing v. Burwell and ideological independenceNext PostThe UN Human Rights Council: “all the cops are criminals…”

Kirkland and Ellis Distinguished Service Professor, University of Chicago Law School

Recent Posts

  • Radical Markets and cognitive load May 15, 2018
  • Radical Markets travels the world May 14, 2018
  • Every argument is two arguments, or the rise of private-sector censorship May 11, 2018
  • Keeping expectations low May 10, 2018
  • More on Radical Markets May 4, 2018
  • The cryptocurrency (and more broadly, blockchain) governance conundrum April 30, 2018
  • Radical Markets around the web April 27, 2018

Subscribe to Blog

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

Copyright © 2014 Eric Posner. All rights reserved. | judyostudio

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.