ERIC POSNER

Search

Primary Menu

Skip to content
  • About
  • Blog
    • CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
    • FINANCIAL REGULATION
    • HUMAN RIGHTS
    • INTERNATIONAL LAW
    • LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP
    • ORIGINALISM
    • QUADRATIC VOTING
    • TEACHING
  • Books
  • Contact
judicial behavior

Party and agreement on the supreme court, updated

June 29, 2015 Eric Posner

Two of my earlier graphs updated through last Friday (with corrections).

sup ct within party 2

sup ct cross party 2

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • More
  • LinkedIn
  • Email

Post navigation

Previous PostKing v. Burwell and ideological independenceNext PostThe UN Human Rights Council: “all the cops are criminals…”

Kirkland and Ellis Distinguished Service Professor, University of Chicago Law School

Recent Posts

  • Libra: not a good idea June 25, 2019
  • The human rights wars heat up! June 7, 2019
  • Gaming out the confrontation between the president and the House May 29, 2019
  • On common ownership; reply to Barry Ritholtz May 17, 2019
  • Two pieces on antitrust law May 15, 2019
  • Labor Monopsony and the Limits of the Law May 5, 2019
  • A remarkable fact about Trump’s poll numbers April 24, 2019

Subscribe to Blog

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

Copyright © 2014 Eric Posner. All rights reserved. | judyostudio

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.