ERIC POSNER

Search

Primary Menu

Skip to content
  • About
  • Blog
    • CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
    • FINANCIAL REGULATION
    • HUMAN RIGHTS
    • INTERNATIONAL LAW
    • LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP
    • ORIGINALISM
    • QUADRATIC VOTING
    • TEACHING
  • Books
  • Contact
judicial behavior

Party and agreement on the supreme court, updated

June 29, 2015 Eric Posner

Two of my earlier graphs updated through last Friday (with corrections).

sup ct within party 2

sup ct cross party 2

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • More
  • LinkedIn

Post navigation

Previous PostKing v. Burwell and ideological independenceNext PostThe UN Human Rights Council: “all the cops are criminals…”

Kirkland and Ellis Distinguished Service Professor, University of Chicago Law School

Recent Posts

  • Wisdom from the (distant) past September 8, 2018
  • The president(s) who swallowed the media August 3, 2018
  • Wisdom from the past July 24, 2018
  • Is Brett Kavanaugh an originalist? July 18, 2018
  • “Yet when we watch the Supreme Court, too many Americans think the decision is pre-baked based on the party of the President who appointed the Justices …” July 10, 2018
  • The Decline of Supreme Court Deference to the President, Trump edition July 1, 2018
  • Radical Markets and cognitive load May 15, 2018

Subscribe to Blog

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

Copyright © 2014 Eric Posner. All rights reserved. | judyostudio